Category: Zen and the Art of YouTube

  • How Long Does It Really Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    How Long Does It Really Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    One photography channel. Sixty-one videos, 584 minutes — 9.74 hours — to publish a video, on average.

    When I searched for the same answer, all I found was noise: vague guesses, conflicting advice, nothing backed by numbers. I needed the numbers.

    So I logged every minute of my workflow across the last few years. Every hour: scripting, shooting, editing. Mistakes included. The point is to see them clearly, learn from them, and avoid repeating them.

    What follows is the data. Take what’s useful. Leave the rest.

    How Long Does It Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    The average time to create a YouTube video on my photography channel is 584 minutes — 9.74 hours (9:44).

    MIN1.87
    MAX60.92
    MEDIAN7.37
    AVG9.74

    The range is extreme. The fastest came in just under 2 hours, a quick repurpose of old content. At the other end, one video consumed almost 61 hours. That marathon also turned out to be the channel’s best performer (a story for another post).

    To show the distribution, here are two box plots: one with outliers, and one without.

    Box plot showing total hours per YouTube video, with outliers included. Range: 1.87–60.92 hours, median 7.37 hours.
    Box plot showing total hours per YouTube video, excluding outliers. Range compressed, median 7.37 hours.

    The Multiplier: Time per Published Minute 

    On average, each published minute of video required 169 minutes of work — a multiplier of 169x.

    MIN48
    MAX359
    MEDIAN147
    AVG169

    To show how inconsistent this ratio can be, here’s a box plot of the multiplier: minutes of work required for each published minute of video.

    Box plot showing the multiplier of minutes worked per published minute of video. Range 48–359×, median 147×, average 169×.

    The spread runs from 48× at the low end to 359× at the high end. This is the key metric to watch if you want to see whether you’re getting more efficient with your time. For now, my data is still inconclusive.

    YouTube Video Production Breakdown 

    Here’s where the hours actually go:

    • Pre-Production — ideation, research, planning, scripting
    • Production — shooting, voiceover
    • Post-Production — importing, editing, thumbnails, show notes
    • Publishing — uploads to YouTube and website
    • Marketing — promotion (mainly Instagram)
    • Other — admin, backups, maintenance
    Pre-Production1.3313.7%
    Production2.9530.3%
    Post-Production4.8750.0%
    Publishing0.434.4%
    Marketing0.121.3%
    Other0.030.3%
    Total9.74100.0%

    If you thought YouTube was about filming, the numbers prove otherwise. Only 30% in production, out in the field shooting. Nearly 65% happens behind a desk — planning, scripting, editing.

    By comparison, the time spent on publishing, marketing, and other is negligible per video. They do add up, so I track them in monthly reports.

    The Bottleneck: Editing Time

    Editing is the single largest sink of hours: 60% of post-production and ~30% of total time — almost equal to shooting itself (2.77 vs 2.92 hours).

    Editing demands as much time as being out shooting, but without the energy of the field. It is where my enthusiasm drains fastest — and where momentum usually dies.

    This is where projects stall. Push it and the schedule slips; keep pushing and the channel breaks.

    Time is the true cost. Gear is a one-off purchase. Software renews monthly. Time compounds, and once it’s gone, it’s gone. Ignore it, and the channel pays.

    Perfection kills, momentum breaks, systems save.

  • Social Media Monthly Report – August 2025: How Long It Really Takes to Make YouTube Videos

    Social Media Monthly Report – August 2025: How Long It Really Takes to Make YouTube Videos

    August took ~35 hours to produce two episodes of The Photography Channel. More than half of that time disappeared into post-production. On average, each finished minute of video required about two hours of work. That’s the multiplier — the real cost of running a YouTube channel.

    This is the first in a series of Social Media Monthly Reports. Each month, I’ll share numbers, hours, and notes that show what it actually takes to build a creative media business.

    Executive Summary

    Two videos went live this month out of a target of four. In total, I spent 34.75 hours on the channel. Views came in at 461, a slight dip of 6% compared to July; watch time rose by 25% to 20.9 hours. Subscribers grew to 174, up 12 from last month.

    This month I fell short of the four-video target — not because of lack of ideas or problems in production; time slipped away in the edit, and I didn’t maintain the schedule.

    Production Breakdown


    HoursPercent
    Pre-Production9.2527%
    Production3.4210%
    Post-Production18.0852%
    Publishing0.501%
    Marketing00%
    Other3.5010%
    Total34.75100%

    The plan for August was four videos; only two were completed. July delivered four videos after a long gap since February, so inconsistency remains a factor.

    Out of 34.75 hours, 52% went into post-production, with video editing alone accounting for 37% of all time spent. Pre-production (ideas and scripts) continues to take a significant share, while production itself is lean and efficient. Admin and other tasks made up around 10%.

    Key Metrics



    Change
    Impressions7970-23%
    Views4616%
    Click-through Rate (CTR)4%
    Total Watch Time (Hours)20.925%
    Subscribers17412
    Total34.75100%

    The numbers are modest, but they’re honest. After a long break from YouTube and an uneven month, they set a baseline for what a small channel produces under strain.

    Next Month (SEP 2025)

    The goals are clear:

    • Publish 4 videos.
    • Invest ~60 hours, with post-production under 50%.
    • Streamline editing to save time.
    • Track the same KPIs as August for month-over-month comparison.

    The aim is to hold this output steady for the next six months before adding specific targets for views, watch time, or subscribers.

    Closing

    This is the cost of doing the work — measured in hours, not hype. If you’re building your own machine, start by tracking your inputs.

    For those who prefer the full data in one go, I’ve pulled the charts into a short deck. The “boardroom version” of this report — 45 seconds, numbers only.

    This is the first in a monthly series. The next Social Media Monthly Report will follow in October. If you want to keep track of how the numbers move, subscribe.

  • Systems Save Your Channel: Lessons from Three False Starts

    Systems Save Your Channel: Lessons from Three False Starts

    Three channels in eight years. Two are dead; the third is barely alive. Creators don’t die from lack of ideas — they die from lost momentum, burnout, or the refusal to hit publish. I know because I buried my own. Over-prepared, over-spent, over-thought — I dug the graves myself. I learned the hard way that perfectionism kills, momentum breaks, and only systems save your channel.

    Perfectionism Kills

    In 2017, I decided to start a YouTube channel. The idea was simple: document a hobby I was already sinking time and money into. I had a topic I cared about, a steady paycheck, and money to burn. So I burned it.

    I bought all the gear — and then some. A fancy camera, an expensive mic, a drone, the whole kit.

    By early 2018, I had the concept worked out. I designed a logo, built a release schedule, wrote a business plan, and mapped out my first series of videos.

    And yet, two years later, by December 2019 my channel had 0 views and 0 subscribers.

    I never uploaded a single video. I spent those years circling the drain — reading, rewriting, re-editing, scrapping, repeating. Chasing “perfect.” The videos were never “ready.”

    I wanted the launch flawless. No compromises. The result? A two-year-old channel with no videos, no viewers, no subscribers — only disappointment.

    In early 2020, I forced the launch. I ignored the shaky footage, the bad thumbnails, the weak topics. Done was better than perfect.

    Twelve episodes made it out. By the time the twelfth dropped, I knew it was the last.

    COVID may have killed the channel’s premise, but perfectionism had already buried it.

    Years of work, thousands of dollars spent, twelve episodes, and 29 subscribers to show for it.

    Not the worst blunder of my career, but it still stings.

    Momentum Breaks

    By the time COVID restrictions lifted, I was in a new job on a new continent — living inside a guarded compound in Africa. No roaming around with expensive gear there.

    What I did have was time. Weekends free. A reading list as long as the Nile. Old books, some out of print for decades. Then I found an article, more than a hundred years old, on a subject I was already obsessed with.

    In less than an hour, I had the first three episodes sketched. 

    I was starting a podcast.

    For nine straight Saturdays, I kept the streak. I’d finish the book I was reading, then record my voice into a beat-up office microphone. My “studio” was a blanket, two pillows, and a couple of couch cushions. It worked.

    The podcast was niche on top of niche, but it brought me joy. And then I moved again.

    Turbulent years. Asia. Europe. Africa. Asia, again. Four countries, three continents, three jobs — all in under three years.

    Each move broke the rhythm. And because the show was never baked into a system, I couldn’t recover it. The gear was minimal, the prep was light — but without a structure to anchor it, the podcast collapsed the moment life pulled me away.

    Momentum is hard to build, sometimes even harder to rebuild

    By the time I was ready to relaunch, I was back where I’d started in 2019. Full circle — and no podcast left standing.

    Systems Save Your Channel

    By 2023, I was back where I started: one dead YouTube channel and a broken podcast. Restarting either felt heavy — one required too much money, the other too much time. Both needed a serious reboot.

    So I started fresh. A new YouTube channel. Less ambitious than the first, lighter than the podcast. A weekly video on another hobby I’d picked up — photography.

    I’m now over sixty episodes in. The channel is still struggling to get traction, but it has potential.

    This time I launched without over-planning — and learned faster than I ever had before.

    Publish, learn, repeat. 

    I improved far faster than I ever did reading tutorials or obsessing over plans. Learning by doing works.

    But I underestimated the effort. Publishing weekly without systems meant every video felt like starting from scratch. The schedule slipped, the backlog grew, and catching up became the routine.

    One video blew up while I was on a business trip, and I had nothing ready to follow it. The spike died as quickly as it came. Inconsistency killed the chance to build momentum.

    Forget the myth that “consistency is for the algorithm.” Audiences might forgive missed uploads, algorithms might look the other way. But YouTube won’t invest in you if you don’t invest in yourself. 

    Consistency is for you — to create momentum, to keep learning, to stay sharp, to catch the rare moments when the door cracks open. And consistency comes from structure: templates and checklists to cut decision fatigue, a backlog to absorb life’s chaos, and a release pipeline that makes publishing as automatic as possible.

    Without those systems, you’re gambling on willpower. And willpower doesn’t scale

    Systems don’t just save time. Systems save your channel.

    Zen Against The Machine

    Through all of this — false starts, broken streaks, and hard-won lessons — I kept records. Every hour spent scripting, shooting, editing. Every dollar burned on gear I needed, and gear I didn’t.

    Zen Against The Machine exists to track those lessons in real time. To build in public. To show how creative projects survive, fail, or adapt when tested in the wild.

    The point isn’t to avoid mistakes. It’s to see them clearly, learn faster, and build with intent.

    If you want to see what it really takes to build an online business without hype or shortcuts, stick around or start here: The Experiment Begins.

    Take what’s useful for your project. Leave the rest.