Blog

  • From Trash to Progress: Recycling Sunk Costs

    The video that nearly broke my channel took 42.5 hours to make. The one before it took 60.9. The latest just 26.2 — but I stopped cold at ~80%. These numbers were a warning.

    The first video hit 4,000 views for my channel and created a false benchmark: “great content at any cost.”

    I tried to run that play twice more. The second attempt didn’t move the needle and burned time I couldn’t afford. On the third attempt, I finally recognized what was happening: I wasn’t editing toward a result; I was editing to justify hours already spent.

    So I walked away with footage still on the timeline.

    Weeks later, after a few failed shoots, I opened the draft again—no emotion, just arithmetic. What would it take to finish the draft, publish, move forward. Not perfect. Efficient.

    This post is about that decision. Not how to make “better” videos, but how to treat sunk costs — and how to recycle some of it into progress when the math, not the mood, says it’s the right move.

    Repeating the Pattern

    The first video hit ~4,000 views. I went from almost nothing to 175 subscribers. I considered it a great success. It took 60.9 hours to make. With zero experience in filming, voiceover, or editing in Davinci Resolve, I treated that time as valuable tuition in a learning curve. More importantly, I drew the wrong conclusion: create great content at any cost.

    I tried to run that play again. The second attempt took 42.5 hours and flatilined. Same intensity, worse result. I hadn’t cracked anything. I’d just overbuilt a process around an outlier.

    The cost wasn’t only hours. Long productions meant fewer releases, a slipping schedule, and rising pressure to “make the next one great,” which made each new project heavier.

    The error was simple: I promoted a one-off outlier to a template. I let a single success set the standard for effort. Effort that wasn’t sustainable for a small channel. By the time I started my third attempt, the pattern was visible — if I was only willing to see it.

    The Stop Test

    About 20 hours into the third video — I hit a wall. I already spent more than twice the time an average video used to take me to complete. The work felt heavy in a way the footage couldn’t explain. I was missing deadlines and was emotionally drained and risking burnout.

    • So I ran a simple Stop Test:
      Is finishing faster than starting fresh? I truly didn’t know. The timeline was tangled and unclear. Treat that as a no.
    • Will continuing work jeopardize my next release window? At the current pace, yes.

    Result: stop. I closed the project with footage still on the timeline.

    Stopping wasn’t failure; it was protection; I was in control again. It preserved time and attention for the next piece of work that actually had a path to completion.

    Recycling Sunk Costs

    A few attempts at new episodes went nowhere. Nothing clicked. The channels momentum was long gong and so was the release schedule. The frustration, however, was growing.

    I reopened that third project again — no emotion, just arithmetic.

    • I ran the Stop Test again with fresh inputs:
      Is finishing faster than starting fresh? Yes. With minimal viable effort: 4 hours (it ended up ~5.4) hours to finish vs ~10.0 hours for a completely new episode.
    • Will finishing now jeopardize the next release window? No. Finishing now will get me back on track.

    Decision: finish! Efficient, not perfect.

    I cut what wasn’t essential, kept what worked, and wrapped up the work in 5.4 hours.

    This wasn’t about rescuing a bad idea; it wasn’t about recovering sunk costs; it was simply recycling prior effort in an efficient way. That single choice turned stalled work into forward motion.

    Outcome + Takeaway

    I published the video a few hours before writing this. Early stats are inconclusive but they also don’t matter. The point was to get an episode out and get moving again. On that, it worked.

    This wasn’t an endorsement of the project. It was a practical choice: finishing it was faster than starting fresh and didn’t put the next release at risk. That’s all.

    What changed is simple: I went from stalled to moving, with a clear next window to make the following episode properly.

    If you’re stuck, take a few minutes and audit your drafts. Look for anything that could be completed faster than starting something new. Don’t fix it — finish it.

    You can’t recover those lost hours, but perhaps you can recycle them into future momentum.

  • Social Media Monthly Report – September 2025

    Social Media Monthly Report – September 2025

    August took ~35 hours to produce two episodes of The Photography Channel. September took ~34 hours and produced none. Zero releases this month. 

    This is the second in a series of Social Media Monthly Reports. Each month, I’ll share numbers, hours, and notes that show what it actually takes to build a creative media business. Even if it means revealing the ugly truth.

    Executive Summary

    September’s target was straightforward:

    • Publish 4 videos.
    • Invest ~60 hours, with post-production under 50%.
    • Streamline editing to save time.
    • Track the same KPIs as August for month-over-month comparison.

    The aim was to hold a steady output before adding specific targets for views, watch time, or subscribers. Instead, I tried to recreate outliers, chased perfection, and ended up with nothing: target hours were not met, zero videos were released, and inconsistency remains the major factor plaguing the channel.

    Here is the month in numbers.

    Key Metrics


    AUGSEPChange
    Impressions79702353-5570
    Views461138-323
    Click-through Rate (CTR)4%3.8%-0.2 pp
    Total Watch Time (Hours)20.97.4-13.5
    Subscribers174175+1

    No uploads meant fewer impressions, fewer views, and a sharp drop in watch time. CTR held steady; the problem was output, not packaging. 

    This is what a zero-release month yields.

    Production Breakdown


    AUG (Hours)AUG (%)SEP (Hours)SEP (%)
    Pre-Production9.2527%13.0039%
    Production3.4210%3.009%
    Post-Production18.0852%7.2521%
    Publishing0.501%00%
    Marketing00%4.6714%
    Other3.5010%5.7517%
    Total34.75100%33.67100%

    Out of 33.67 hours, 39% went into pre-production: planning and ideation loops. Video editing accounted for about 20% of the time; the drop in post-production hours happened because nothing was finalized, not because editing got faster. Publishing was zero.

    Second-order effects followed. Trying to recreate a prior outlier pushed more scripting and “one more pass” in the edit; two videos’ worth of footage ended up in the recycle bin. With no releases, momentum broke and hours drifted into mundane admin work that didn’t move the channel. Given that pattern, here’s what has to change.

    After-Action Notes

    With momentum, inertia works in your favor and production runs efficiently. Break it, and you pay dearly — clawing back to where you were takes extreme effort. 

    In an earlier post, I wrote about the mistake of chasing outliers. That’s where I slipped this month. 

    The correction is simple: protect the weekly release schedule, and accept imperfections in the cut so videos actually get released.

    Next Month (OCT 2025)

    The goals are simple:

    • Publish 4 videos.
    • Invest ~40 hours, with post-production under 50%.

    The aim is to hold this output steady for the next six months before adding specific targets for views, watch time, or subscribers. The key is consistency and building momentum.

    Closing

    This is the cost of doing the work — measured in hours, not hype. If you’re building your own machine, start by tracking your inputs.

    For those who prefer the full data in one go, I’ve pulled the charts into a short deck. The “boardroom version” of this report — 45 seconds, numbers only.

    This is the second in a monthly series. The next Social Media Monthly Report will follow in November. If you want to keep track of how the numbers move, subscribe.

  • Sacrifice Perfection for Long-Term Progress

    Sacrifice Perfection for Long-Term Progress

    This is the 6th post I’ve published here on Zen Against The Machine — and the 15th I’ve written and uploaded. 

    There were 9 posts I uploaded and later deleted. They were throwaway content — and that was deliberately done. It was part of a process.

    Why Perfectionism Holds You Back

    Perfectionism is your enemy. You’ve heard it before — ‘Done is better than perfect.’ It’s cliché because it’s true.

    For most of us, me included, the instinct is to wait for the perfect idea, the ideal moment, the great piece of content, and to execute it to a level worthy of your own perfectionist criticism. 

    In a previous post, I described such a project that I started and then killed because of my pursuit of perfectionism. 

    If you wait for perfection, you never finish. If you never finish, you never fail, you never learn, and you never get better.

    I faced the same challenge when starting this blog. I had a very vague idea of what I wanted this channel to be. I had no idea how to start it, but I knew I didn’t want this project to die due to chasing perfection.

    Prioritize Output, Not Outcome

    So, I sat myself down and gave myself one simple task: Publish. 

    Here’s what I told myself: “You’ve got an hour.” An hour to produce something. Not something great. Just something finished. 

    I knew an hour wasn’t enough for anything substantial. But it was good enough to put up a piece of throwaway content — something to be deleted later. 

    The goal was to have something up there no matter the quality. The following Monday, I repeated the process. Two pieces of throwaway content were now online. By the third week, there were three pieces.   

    I wasn’t worrying about quality, not overthinking. I was just getting something out there. I posted content I knew wasn’t good — content that was intentionally imperfect. 

    Why Throwaway Content Works

    How do you get good at doing pull-ups? You start doing pull-ups. 

    The same applies to creating content — you start, even if it’s imperfect. The first few will be messy, maybe even painful, but you’ll get better by doing, not by waiting.

    Just like with pull-ups, over time you will get better — but only if you keep to the routine.

    When I started, I set my goal to publish. These posts weren’t meant to be good; they were just about forming a schedule. I knew they wouldn’t be perfect — and I didn’t care. They were throwaway content, meant for one purpose: to build the habit of publishing.

    And here’s the thing: By my fifth throwaway post, I was refining my process. I no longer had to force myself to sit down and publish — the resistance had been squashed. 

    By my sixth post I found myself focusing on the content and refining my workflow. My first five pieces of throwaway content were my best teachers.

    Creating throwaway content is just the beginning — building a routine is what drives momentum.

    Build Momentum Through Routines

    Throwaway content doesn’t necessarily mean bad content. I still worked to produce something worth sharing, but the focus was on finishing something within 1 hour. 

    The ultimate goal remained getting started, forming a routine, and building momentum. By putting something out there, no matter how imperfect, I achieved those goals.

    As I create more, I get faster, more confident, and more focused. It is through consistent action — not perfection — that I am improving.

    Sacrifice Perfection for Progress

    Imperfection is a tool, not a setback. By letting go of perfection early on, you learn faster, adapt quicker, and get better with each post.

    Sacrifice perfection. Focus on forming habits and routines in the early stages. Learn through doing. Start where you are, with what you’ve got, stumble, fail, and build from there. Sacrifice perfection in the short-term for long-term growth.

    Take Action: Post Your Fast Five

    Here’s your challenge: If you’re stuck, stop overthinking and start creating. Post five pieces of content — no matter how imperfect. Get them out there. Learn from them. Don’t be afraid of getting it wrong. The only way to get better is to start.

    Start. Finish something. Doesn’t matter what, doesn’t matter how good, doesn’t matter how bad, it just needs to be done.

    Post your first five pieces, throw them away, and move forward. Fail fast, learn faster, and get on the path to long-term growth.

  • Outlier Videos Don’t Build Channels: The Case for Consistency and Sustainable YouTube Growth

    Outlier Videos Don’t Build Channels: The Case for Consistency and Sustainable YouTube Growth

    My best performing video on The Photography Channel was an outlier. 

    While most videos struggled to break 100 views, this video crossed 100 comments in a few days and reached over 3,750 views; more than 50x the average of 73 views. 

    It also nearly killed my channel in the process.

    Video #52

    Before that outlier, I had already published 51 videos on my Photography Channel. They received very little views and I was understandably frustrated. 

    For 199 days and 20 videos, silence — until one professional photographer finally commented: ‘This is a criminally underrated channel!!!’ Very encouraging, but still no momentum.

    So I tried something new. I experimented with structure, stuck to my weekly upload schedule, and failed. I tried again. Failed. A third time. Same result.

    Then I decided to go all in on a radically new format. I thought it through endlessly, committed resources, and still wasn’t happy with it. But after it consumed too much time, I uploaded it anyway and left town for the weekend.

    By the time I was back online, Video #52 had taken off. Views spiked. Comments started pouring in. My subscribers jumped from 6 to 106.

    I thought I had cracked the formula. But I didn’t look at the numbers behind the numbers.

    The Numbers Behind The Numbers

    The first 51 videos took, on average, less than 8 hours to produce.

    Pre-Production0.567.2%
    Production2.8136.0%
    Post-Production3.8148.9%
    Publishing0.476.0%
    Marketing0.101.3%
    Other0.030.4%
    Total7.79100.0%

    Video #52 was different. It took a total of 61 hours to complete.

    Pre-Production26.7543.9%
    Production6.9211.4%
    Post-Production25.5041.9%
    Publishing0.250.4%
    Marketing1.502.5%
    Other0.0%
    Total60.92100.0%

    The pre-production was manageable. The editing nearly broke me.

    The Trap

    A Tactical Error

    Not anticipating success was forgivable. Following it with three weaker videos, already in the pipeline, wasn’t. They performed like the old videos — but now it stung.

    A Strategic Failure

    The real strategic mistake was deciding to stick with the new heavy format. 61 hours for one video is unsustainable. That’s two weeks of full-time work, or a month if it’s a side project. 

    Still, I pushed forward. The next video took 42.5 hours — stretched painfully over 4.5 months. I forced it out just to publish. It was weaker, late, and momentum was gone. It tanked.

    Eventually, I returned to my previous (lighter) format. Consistency returned, views doubled, and growth resumed. Slow and steady.

    Until recently, when I repeated the same error: chasing another outlier. One month later, and still nothing to show for it. I had to stop and reset. Consistency is my top priority again.

    Consistency Leads To Sustainability

    Ideally, every video should be like video #52 — well-researched and executed. But that is not sustainable.

    I enjoyed the results. I hated the process. The 25+ hours of editing drained all joy. That’s not viable for a small channel. 

    That’s why I’m returning to the lighter format and weekly uploads. Not because consistency is a value on its own — but because it is a tool enabling sustainability.

    Growth may be slower. Views may be lower. But the channel will survive. 

    Cash Flow and Time Flow

    Starting an online social media business today has almost no barriers-to-entry. 

    In traditional business environments what usually causes small and starting businesses to fail is lack of cash flow. Creators fail from lack of time flow.

    Time is the true currency.

    Manage it like cash. Unlike cash, time can’t be replenished.


    You can’t build on outliers. Celebrate them when they happen, but it’s the average, repeatable videos that you consistently upload that carry a channel forward.

    I was watching the speedometer, ignoring the empty gas tank.

  • How Long Does It Really Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    How Long Does It Really Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    One photography channel. Sixty-one videos, 584 minutes — 9.74 hours — to publish a video, on average.

    When I searched for the same answer, all I found was noise: vague guesses, conflicting advice, nothing backed by numbers. I needed the numbers.

    So I logged every minute of my workflow across the last few years. Every hour: scripting, shooting, editing. Mistakes included. The point is to see them clearly, learn from them, and avoid repeating them.

    What follows is the data. Take what’s useful. Leave the rest.

    How Long Does It Take to Make a YouTube Video?

    The average time to create a YouTube video on my photography channel is 584 minutes — 9.74 hours (9:44).

    MIN1.87
    MAX60.92
    MEDIAN7.37
    AVG9.74

    The range is extreme. The fastest came in just under 2 hours, a quick repurpose of old content. At the other end, one video consumed almost 61 hours. That marathon also turned out to be the channel’s best performer (a story for another post).

    To show the distribution, here are two box plots: one with outliers, and one without.

    Box plot showing total hours per YouTube video, with outliers included. Range: 1.87–60.92 hours, median 7.37 hours.
    Box plot showing total hours per YouTube video, excluding outliers. Range compressed, median 7.37 hours.

    The Multiplier: Time per Published Minute 

    On average, each published minute of video required 169 minutes of work — a multiplier of 169x.

    MIN48
    MAX359
    MEDIAN147
    AVG169

    To show how inconsistent this ratio can be, here’s a box plot of the multiplier: minutes of work required for each published minute of video.

    Box plot showing the multiplier of minutes worked per published minute of video. Range 48–359×, median 147×, average 169×.

    The spread runs from 48× at the low end to 359× at the high end. This is the key metric to watch if you want to see whether you’re getting more efficient with your time. For now, my data is still inconclusive.

    YouTube Video Production Breakdown 

    Here’s where the hours actually go:

    • Pre-Production — ideation, research, planning, scripting
    • Production — shooting, voiceover
    • Post-Production — importing, editing, thumbnails, show notes
    • Publishing — uploads to YouTube and website
    • Marketing — promotion (mainly Instagram)
    • Other — admin, backups, maintenance
    Pre-Production1.3313.7%
    Production2.9530.3%
    Post-Production4.8750.0%
    Publishing0.434.4%
    Marketing0.121.3%
    Other0.030.3%
    Total9.74100.0%

    If you thought YouTube was about filming, the numbers prove otherwise. Only 30% in production, out in the field shooting. Nearly 65% happens behind a desk — planning, scripting, editing.

    By comparison, the time spent on publishing, marketing, and other is negligible per video. They do add up, so I track them in monthly reports.

    The Bottleneck: Editing Time

    Editing is the single largest sink of hours: 60% of post-production and ~30% of total time — almost equal to shooting itself (2.77 vs 2.92 hours).

    Editing demands as much time as being out shooting, but without the energy of the field. It is where my enthusiasm drains fastest — and where momentum usually dies.

    This is where projects stall. Push it and the schedule slips; keep pushing and the channel breaks.

    Time is the true cost. Gear is a one-off purchase. Software renews monthly. Time compounds, and once it’s gone, it’s gone. Ignore it, and the channel pays.

    Perfection kills, momentum breaks, systems save.

  • Social Media Monthly Report – August 2025: How Long It Really Takes to Make YouTube Videos

    Social Media Monthly Report – August 2025: How Long It Really Takes to Make YouTube Videos

    August took ~35 hours to produce two episodes of The Photography Channel. More than half of that time disappeared into post-production. On average, each finished minute of video required about two hours of work. That’s the multiplier — the real cost of running a YouTube channel.

    This is the first in a series of Social Media Monthly Reports. Each month, I’ll share numbers, hours, and notes that show what it actually takes to build a creative media business.

    Executive Summary

    Two videos went live this month out of a target of four. In total, I spent 34.75 hours on the channel. Views came in at 461, a slight dip of 6% compared to July; watch time rose by 25% to 20.9 hours. Subscribers grew to 174, up 12 from last month.

    This month I fell short of the four-video target — not because of lack of ideas or problems in production; time slipped away in the edit, and I didn’t maintain the schedule.

    Production Breakdown


    HoursPercent
    Pre-Production9.2527%
    Production3.4210%
    Post-Production18.0852%
    Publishing0.501%
    Marketing00%
    Other3.5010%
    Total34.75100%

    The plan for August was four videos; only two were completed. July delivered four videos after a long gap since February, so inconsistency remains a factor.

    Out of 34.75 hours, 52% went into post-production, with video editing alone accounting for 37% of all time spent. Pre-production (ideas and scripts) continues to take a significant share, while production itself is lean and efficient. Admin and other tasks made up around 10%.

    Key Metrics



    Change
    Impressions7970-23%
    Views4616%
    Click-through Rate (CTR)4%
    Total Watch Time (Hours)20.925%
    Subscribers17412
    Total34.75100%

    The numbers are modest, but they’re honest. After a long break from YouTube and an uneven month, they set a baseline for what a small channel produces under strain.

    Next Month (SEP 2025)

    The goals are clear:

    • Publish 4 videos.
    • Invest ~60 hours, with post-production under 50%.
    • Streamline editing to save time.
    • Track the same KPIs as August for month-over-month comparison.

    The aim is to hold this output steady for the next six months before adding specific targets for views, watch time, or subscribers.

    Closing

    This is the cost of doing the work — measured in hours, not hype. If you’re building your own machine, start by tracking your inputs.

    For those who prefer the full data in one go, I’ve pulled the charts into a short deck. The “boardroom version” of this report — 45 seconds, numbers only.

    This is the first in a monthly series. The next Social Media Monthly Report will follow in October. If you want to keep track of how the numbers move, subscribe.

  • Systems Save Your Channel: Lessons from Three False Starts

    Systems Save Your Channel: Lessons from Three False Starts

    Three channels in eight years. Two are dead; the third is barely alive. Creators don’t die from lack of ideas — they die from lost momentum, burnout, or the refusal to hit publish. I know because I buried my own. Over-prepared, over-spent, over-thought — I dug the graves myself. I learned the hard way that perfectionism kills, momentum breaks, and only systems save your channel.

    Perfectionism Kills

    In 2017, I decided to start a YouTube channel. The idea was simple: document a hobby I was already sinking time and money into. I had a topic I cared about, a steady paycheck, and money to burn. So I burned it.

    I bought all the gear — and then some. A fancy camera, an expensive mic, a drone, the whole kit.

    By early 2018, I had the concept worked out. I designed a logo, built a release schedule, wrote a business plan, and mapped out my first series of videos.

    And yet, two years later, by December 2019 my channel had 0 views and 0 subscribers.

    I never uploaded a single video. I spent those years circling the drain — reading, rewriting, re-editing, scrapping, repeating. Chasing “perfect.” The videos were never “ready.”

    I wanted the launch flawless. No compromises. The result? A two-year-old channel with no videos, no viewers, no subscribers — only disappointment.

    In early 2020, I forced the launch. I ignored the shaky footage, the bad thumbnails, the weak topics. Done was better than perfect.

    Twelve episodes made it out. By the time the twelfth dropped, I knew it was the last.

    COVID may have killed the channel’s premise, but perfectionism had already buried it.

    Years of work, thousands of dollars spent, twelve episodes, and 29 subscribers to show for it.

    Not the worst blunder of my career, but it still stings.

    Momentum Breaks

    By the time COVID restrictions lifted, I was in a new job on a new continent — living inside a guarded compound in Africa. No roaming around with expensive gear there.

    What I did have was time. Weekends free. A reading list as long as the Nile. Old books, some out of print for decades. Then I found an article, more than a hundred years old, on a subject I was already obsessed with.

    In less than an hour, I had the first three episodes sketched. 

    I was starting a podcast.

    For nine straight Saturdays, I kept the streak. I’d finish the book I was reading, then record my voice into a beat-up office microphone. My “studio” was a blanket, two pillows, and a couple of couch cushions. It worked.

    The podcast was niche on top of niche, but it brought me joy. And then I moved again.

    Turbulent years. Asia. Europe. Africa. Asia, again. Four countries, three continents, three jobs — all in under three years.

    Each move broke the rhythm. And because the show was never baked into a system, I couldn’t recover it. The gear was minimal, the prep was light — but without a structure to anchor it, the podcast collapsed the moment life pulled me away.

    Momentum is hard to build, sometimes even harder to rebuild

    By the time I was ready to relaunch, I was back where I’d started in 2019. Full circle — and no podcast left standing.

    Systems Save Your Channel

    By 2023, I was back where I started: one dead YouTube channel and a broken podcast. Restarting either felt heavy — one required too much money, the other too much time. Both needed a serious reboot.

    So I started fresh. A new YouTube channel. Less ambitious than the first, lighter than the podcast. A weekly video on another hobby I’d picked up — photography.

    I’m now over sixty episodes in. The channel is still struggling to get traction, but it has potential.

    This time I launched without over-planning — and learned faster than I ever had before.

    Publish, learn, repeat. 

    I improved far faster than I ever did reading tutorials or obsessing over plans. Learning by doing works.

    But I underestimated the effort. Publishing weekly without systems meant every video felt like starting from scratch. The schedule slipped, the backlog grew, and catching up became the routine.

    One video blew up while I was on a business trip, and I had nothing ready to follow it. The spike died as quickly as it came. Inconsistency killed the chance to build momentum.

    Forget the myth that “consistency is for the algorithm.” Audiences might forgive missed uploads, algorithms might look the other way. But YouTube won’t invest in you if you don’t invest in yourself. 

    Consistency is for you — to create momentum, to keep learning, to stay sharp, to catch the rare moments when the door cracks open. And consistency comes from structure: templates and checklists to cut decision fatigue, a backlog to absorb life’s chaos, and a release pipeline that makes publishing as automatic as possible.

    Without those systems, you’re gambling on willpower. And willpower doesn’t scale

    Systems don’t just save time. Systems save your channel.

    Zen Against The Machine

    Through all of this — false starts, broken streaks, and hard-won lessons — I kept records. Every hour spent scripting, shooting, editing. Every dollar burned on gear I needed, and gear I didn’t.

    Zen Against The Machine exists to track those lessons in real time. To build in public. To show how creative projects survive, fail, or adapt when tested in the wild.

    The point isn’t to avoid mistakes. It’s to see them clearly, learn faster, and build with intent.

    If you want to see what it really takes to build an online business without hype or shortcuts, stick around or start here: The Experiment Begins.

    Take what’s useful for your project. Leave the rest.

  • Zen Against The Machine: The Social Media Experiment Begins

    Zen Against The Machine: The Social Media Experiment Begins

    Yup. That’s me. You probably wonder how I ended up in this situation — building a social media presence from scratch in my late forties — let’s start at the beginning.

    How I Got Here

    I’m forty-eight, and after two decades of working my arse off, I’ve gone back to old hobbies — reading, photography, travel. I also decided it was time to stop ignoring the world of YouTube, podcasts, and social media.

    The goal? Build a modest, sustainable income from an online presence — and document the whole thing with 100% transparency. The real numbers, the mistakes, the follies, and whatever wins come along the way.

    Why Bother?

    I might not know the inner workings of an Instagram Reel (yet), but I do know how to build and run businesses. Over the last 30 years, I’ve started and managed companies across three continents:

    • Consulting firms in Europe, Africa, and East Asia — some still running after 20 years.
    • A tech business with a six-figure annual turnover.
    • An industrial manufacturing plant with seven-figures revenue and 150+ employees.

    I’ve served as CEO, CFO, head of marketing, sat on a non-profit board, and worked my way up from the trenches. (Literally — I also spent time in the military.)

    The Mission

    This isn’t theory. Zen Against The Machine is a live case study. The aim: document the building of three distinct brands — this blog, a long-form narrative History Podcast, and a Photography Channel on YouTube.

    You’ll see everything:

    • Wins, losses, and inevitable blunders.
    • Full stats, KPIs, and financials. — the kind of radical transparency that’s rare in online business.
    • The actual systems I use to keep it all moving.

    The Setup

    The brands will stay nameless here, so each can grow on its own merits — no cross-promotion. That way you’ll see the raw, unfiltered journey of small channels trying to get traction, just like yours might be.

    For now, I’ll refer to them simply as:

    • ZATM – this blog.
    • The History Project – my long-form narrative history podcast.
    • The Photography Project – my photography YouTube channel.

    The Rules of Engagement

    Here’s how I’ll share the journey:

    • 10th of each month – Monthly report: KPIs, financials, lessons.
    • 25th of each month – In-depth posts on strategy and tactics.
    • Every Monday – Weekly check-in to review progress and set priorities.

    The Call To Action

    Every piece of content needs a clear purpose. This one’s simple — to get you to follow the journey.

    If you want to see what it really takes to build an online business without hype or shortcuts, stick around. 

    Subscribe for updates. Watch the wins, the mistakes, and the long stretches of unglamorous work that make or break a project.

    Take what’s useful for your project and ignore the rest.

    The work starts now.